The Hubble Space Telescope:
The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) is a telescope in orbit around the Earth, named after astronomer Edwin Hubble for his discovery of galaxies outside the Milky Way and his creation of Hubble's Law, which calculates the rate at which the universe is expanding. Its position outside the Earth's atmosphere allows it to take sharp optical images of very faint objects, and since its launch in 1990, it has become one of the most important instruments in the history of astronomy. It has been responsible for many ground-breaking observations and has helped astronomers achieve a better understanding of many fundamental problems in astrophysics. Hubble's Ultra Deep Field is the deepest (most sensitive) astronomical optical image ever taken.
|
| Hubble Pans Across Deep Space |
From its original conception in 1946 until its launch, the project to build a space telescope was beset by delays and budget problems. Immediately after its launch, it was found that the main mirror suffered from spherical aberration, severely compromising the telescope's capabilities. However, after a servicing mission in 1993, the telescope was restored to its planned quality and became a vital research tool as well as a public relations boon for astronomy. The HST is part of NASA's Great Observatories series, with the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory, the Chandra X-ray Observatory, and the Spitzer Space Telescope.
The future of Hubble is currently uncertain. Its stabilizing gyroscopes need replacing, and without intervention to boost its orbit it will re-enter the Earth's atmosphere sometime after 2010. Following the Columbia Space Shuttle disaster, NASA decided that a repair mission by astronauts would be unreasonably dangerous. The organization later reconsidered this position, but a final servicing mission still depends on the success of the Space Shuttle program in overcoming the design flaws which led to the Columbia disaster.
Hubble's successor telescope, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), is due to be launched in 2013 and will be far superior to Hubble for most astronomical research programs. However, the JWST will only observe in infrared, so it will not replace Hubble's ability to observe in the visible part of the spectrum.
The history of the Hubble Space Telescope can be traced back as far as 1946, when astronomer Lyman Spitzer wrote a paper entitled Astronomical advantages of an extra-terrestrial observatory. In it, he discussed the two main advantages that a space-based observatory would have over ground-based telescopes: First, the angular resolution (smallest separation at which objects can be clearly distinguished) would be limited only by diffraction, rather than by the turbulence in the atmosphere which causes stars to twinkle and is known to astronomers as seeing. At that time ground-based telescopes were limited to resolutions of 0.5–1.0 arcseconds, compared to a theoretical diffraction-limited resolution of about 0.1 arcsec for a telescope with a mirror 2.5 m in diameter. The second major advantage would be that a space-based telescope could observe infrared and ultraviolet light, which are strongly absorbed by the atmosphere. |
The History Of Interstellar Space:
The nature of the interstellar medium has received the attention of astronomers and scientists over the centuries. However, they first had to acknowledge the basic concept of "interstellar" space. The term appears to have been first used in print by Francis Bacon in 1626 where he wrote: "The Interstellar Skie.. hath .. so much Affinity with the Starre, that there is a Rotation of that, as well as of the Starre." Later, natural philosopher Robert Boyle surmised: "The inter-stellar part of heaven, which several of the modern Epicureans would have to be empty."
|
| Deep Space Wonders |
 |
| Jupiter |
 |
| Spiral Galaxy |
 |
| Gaseous Nebula |
 |
| Deep Space - Solar System Cluster |
 |
| Andromeda |
Before modern electromagnetic theory early physicists postulated that an invisible luminiferous aether existed as a medium to carry lightwaves. It was assumed that this aether extended into interstellar space, as R. H. Patterson wrote in 1862, "This efflux occasions a thrill, or vibratory motion, in the ether which fills the interstellar spaces" .
The advent of deep photographic imaging allowed Barnard to produce the first images of dark nebulae silhouetted against the background star field of the Galaxy. In 1904 Hartmann detected spectroscopic absorption lines towards a pair of binary stars that could not have come from the stars themselves. The growing evidence for interstellar material led William Henry Pickering to comment in 1912 that "While the interstellar absorbing medium may be simply the ether, yet the character of its selective absorption, as indicated by Kapteyn, is characteristic of a gas, and free gaseous molecules are certainly there, since they are probably constantly being expelled by the Sun and stars..."
The same year Victor Hess's discovery of cosmic rays, highly energetic charged particles that rain down on the Earth from space, led others to speculate whether they also pervaded interstellar space. The following year the Norwegian explorer and physicist Kristian Birkeland wrote: 'It seems to be a natural consequence of our points of view to assume that the whole of space is filled with electrons and flying electric ions of all kinds. We have assumed that each stellar system in evolutions throws off electric corpuscles into space. It does not seem unreasonable therefore to think that the greater part of the material masses in the universe is found, not in the solar systems or nebulae, but in "empty" space.'
In 1930, Samuel L. Thorndike notes that ".. it could scarcely have been believed that the enormous gaps between the stars are completely void. Terrestrial aurorae are not improbably excited by charged particles from the Sun emitted by the Sun. If the millions of other stars are also ejecting ions, as is undoubtedly true, no absolute vacuum can exist within the galaxy".
Solar Systems - Planets:
The International Astronomical Union (IAU), the official scientific body for astronomical nomenclature, currently defines "planet" as a celestial body that, within the Solar System:
(a) is in orbit around the Sun;
(b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape; and
(c) has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit;
or within another system:
(i) is in orbit around a star or stellar remnants;
(ii) has a mass below the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium; and
(iii) is above the minimum mass/size requirement for planetary status in the Solar System.
As a result of this definition, the Solar System is now considered to have eight planets: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. Those objects which fulfil criteria (a) & (b), but not (c) - Ceres, Pluto, and Eris - are categorized as dwarf planets. Prior to the adoption of the 2006 resolution, there was no formal scientific definition of "planet". Without one, the Solar System had been considered to have differing numbers of planets over the years, including Pluto, Ceres and several asteroids at various stages.
Beyond the Solar System, there have been more than two hundred objects discovered orbiting other stars. However, while a formal definition for planets within the Solar System now exists, the IAU's position on those in other systems remains only a working definition in place since 2003. The IAU has not yet taken a position on whether free-floating objects of planetary mass outside star systems count as planets, except to exclude those in young star clusters.
Most objects in orbit round the Sun lie within the same shallow plane, called the ecliptic, which is roughly parallel to the Sun's equator. The planets lie very close to the ecliptic, while comets and kuiper belt objects often lie at significant angles to it. All of the planets, and most other objects, also orbit with the Sun's rotation in a counter-clockwise direction as viewed from a point above the Sun's north pole. There is a direct relationship between how far away a planet is from the Sun, and how quickly it orbits. Mercury, with the smallest orbital circumference, travels the fastest, while Neptune, being much farther from the Sun, travels more slowly.
A planet's distance from the Sun varies in the course of its year. Its closest approach to the Sun is known as its perihelion, while its farthest point from the Sun is called its aphelion. Though planets follow nearly circular orbits, with perihelions roughly equal to their aphelions, many comets, asteroids and objects of the Kuiper belt follow highly elliptical orbits, with large differences between perihelion and aphelion.
Astronomers most often measure distances within the solar system in astronomical units, or AU. One AU is the average distance between the Earth and the Sun, or roughly 149 598 000 km (93,000,000 mi). Pluto is roughly 39 AU from the Sun, while Jupiter lies at roughly 5.2 AU.
Informally, the Solar System is sometimes divided into separate "zones"; the first zone, known as the inner Solar System, comprises the inner planets and the main asteroid belt. The outer solar system is sometimes defined as everything beyond the asteroids; however, it is also the name often given to the region beyond Neptune, with the gas giants as a separate "middle zone."
One common misconception with regards to the Solar System is that the orbits of the major objects (planets, Pluto, and asteroids) are equidistant. Due to the vast distances involved, many representations of the Solar System tend to simplify these orbits, with equal spacing between each object. However, with certain exceptions, it can generally be stated that the farther a planet or belt is from the Sun, the greater the distance between it and the previous orbit. For example, Venus is approximately 0.33 AU farther out than Mercury, whereas Jupiter lies 1.9 AU from the farthest extent of the asteroid belt, and Neptune's orbit is roughly 20 AU farther out than that of Uranus. Attempts have been made to determine a correlation between these distances (see Bode's Law) but to date there is no accepted theory that explains the respective orbital distances.
|
![[Valid RSS]](http://www.fwicki.com/images/v3/ui/valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed")
